Situs Agen Judi Bola Dan Casino Poker Online
She could not do otherwise, but she could at least protect her from accusations that she did well to the gamblers, although Kaminski presented shocking information and evidence of how the law was settled. And this is to serve the purpose of withdrawing the decision on the liquidation of subsidies in time.
On July 30, nothing had happened yet, Tusk did not know anything, did not suspect anything, and it was then, completely sovereignly and caused solely by concern for the budget, that he ordered a new act. His decision, and therefore the elimination of subsidies, has absolutely nothing to do with the activity of gambling lobbyists, about which Tusk learned only two weeks after issuing the order to liquidate these subsidies.
This scenario is trivial and not very revealing. I also do not have any hard evidence to confirm it. However, it has the unquestionable advantage that all the facts and evidence we know so far match. This, of course, does not confirm it yet, but at the beginning it is enough that nothing will disprove it. It is impossible to draw any argument that this could not be so …
The problem of the platform is that its version of a lot of facts and evidence contradicts, contradicts so much that it is able to create only partial scenarios, explaining individual threads and events but together they do not form a single, internally coherent narrative. I do not think that anyone would be able to collect everything we know in such a scenario that would not be easily disposed of with childish ease.
August 25. Gambling lobbyists already know that they are being recorded, they know that they are more or less aware of the matter in the CBA. Sobiesiak “withdraw Magda from the project” to enter Totalizator. In the prosecutor’s office a few hours’ council is held over charges against Kaminski in a case so blunted that for two years it could not be closed, although it was not evidently complicated.You can get this right here without cost judi online.